By Tom Hals

WILMINGTON, Del, Sept 23 (Reuters)– Failed South Korean container provider Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd informed a united state court on Friday that freight proprietors were holding back as much as $80 million in repayments for finished deliveries, making complex the firm’s capability to relocate stuck products.

“Hanjin is not the only bad guy here,” Ilana Volkov, a lawyer for the delivery firm, claimed at a condition hearing at a UNITED STATE Bankruptcy Court in Newark, New Jersey.

Hanjin legal representatives claimed that lots of freight proprietors had actually gotten their products on credit score yet have yet to pay the delivery firm.

Hanjin, the globe’s seventh-largest container provider, applied for personal bankruptcy in August, stranding $14 billion well worth of freight mixed-up as the firm did not have cash money to pay freight trainers, yank drivers or ports.

South Korea’s federal government claimed on Friday that sufficient cash had actually been vowed to discharge Hanjin ships by the end of October.

An lawyer for Ashley Furniture Industries, a Wisconsin- based furnishings manufacturer, informed Friday’s listening to the firm expected that expenses associated with Hanjin’s failing would ultimately surpass what it owed for previous deliveries.

“To hold onto this money is important,” claimed Jeremy Ryan, the lawyer for Ashley.

Like lots of merchants as well as various other freight proprietors, Ashley has actually been stuck paying to obtain its freight from the dockside, despite the fact that Hanjin had actually been paid to supply it to an inland location.

In enhancement, lots of merchants as well as various other freight proprietors have actually grumbled they have actually been stuck to vacant Hanjin containers that ports have actually hesitated to repossess.

Ryan claimed Ashley was compensating to $7,000 daily associated with storage space as well as various other costs for the vacant containers as well as the only means to recover those expenses was to decline to pay Hanjin what was owed for finished shipments.

Judge John Sherwood claimed he recognized the demand to “minimize the pain” of Hanjin’s collapse.

The court informed Hanjin’s lawyers the firm was right in attempting to obtain freight moving “but there has to be some recognition you might be able to deliver on the terms you promised to deliver on.”

Rail drivers as well as various other freight trainers protected themselves at Friday’s hearing versus claims they were price-gouging products proprietors.

Hanjin had actually claimed in a court declaring it was informed that freight trainers such as rail drivers were billing greater than what those trainers billedHanjin (Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Richard Chang)

( c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2016.