![Methanol Seen as a Viable Marine Fuel Alternative, Report Finds Methanol Seen as a Viable Marine Fuel Alternative, Report Finds](https://gcaptain.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/stena-germanicha.jpg)
Methanol Seen as a Viable Marine Fuel Alternative, Report Finds
With renewed strain on the transport trade to chop its greenhouse fuel emissions, a brand new report has discovered that readily-available methanol has a “historic opportunity” to turn into a viable, inexperienced different as a marine gas.
The report, authored by marine vitality methods export Professor Karin Andersson of Sweden’s Chalmers University, was launched Friday by analysis agency FCBI Energy and aimed to look at the viability of methanol instead marine gas to diesel and LNG.
Methanol is a low-emissions gas that has typically been ignored in coverage and trade discussions regardless of having many attributes that make it a sexy marine gas, based on FCBI Energy.
The report discovered that along with being compliant with the strictest worldwide emissions requirements, methanol is abundantly obtainable, 100% renewable and would require solely minor modifications to present bunkering infrastructure. Methanol can be biodegradable, so the results of a spill on the surroundings are low. The report additionally notes that in contrast to LNG, methanol, since it’s a liquid, doesn’t require costly cryogenic gear new to chill pure fuel right into a liquid kind.’
From a price standpoint, the report mentioned that whereas the price benefit of utilizing methanol has eroded in the decrease oil worth surroundings, however methanol costs do present regional variation and stay aggressive in some key transport areas, together with China. In different areas, together with North America for instance, the report says that growth in methanol manufacturing capability in key markets akin to the U.S., ought to put downward strain on prices, making methanol much more cost-competitive. Also, since methanol engines are twin gas, a brief change to marine diesel is all the time potential at deadlines when methanol is costlier, the report notes.
RELATED: Is the Volatile Fuel Used in Racing Cars a New Power Source for Ships?
The Methanol Institute’s CEO Gregory Dolan feedback: “Traditionally one of the world’s most widely shipped chemical commodities, methanol now has an historic opportunity to move from ship’s cargo holds to their fuel bunkers. As this report documents, methanol’s use as a marine fuel provides shippers and port facilities with an affordable option for compliance with tightening emission requirements. Produced from a wide range of feedstocks – including a variety of renewable pathways – methanol provides an ideal pathway to sustainable shipping.”
Earlier this 12 months, Sweden-based Stena Line transformed a big Ro-Pax ship, Stena Germanica, to run on methanol as its fundamental gas, marking the primary business ship on the earth to make the conversion. The conversion took simply six weeks on the Remontowa Shipyard in Gdansk, Poland, and is anticipated to scale back emissions of sulphur (SOx) by about 99%, nitrogen (NOx) by 60%, and carbon dioxide (CO2) by 25% in comparison with custom gas.
Stena Line CEO Carl-Johan Hagman notes that: “the handling and installation of a liquid like methanol had clear advantages over gas or cryogenic fuels regarding fuel storage and bunkering… I believe this report can help raise awareness of this marine fuel and serve as an important source of facts to anyone looking for a greener shipping fuels.”
The report additionally examined potential market improvement methods to advance the usage of methanol as a marine gas, a complete checklist of all analysis and improvement tasks with methanol as a marine gas, and an index of corporations concerned within the marine methanol trade.
The report comes on the heels of the renewed strain on the transport trade to scale back its general greenhouse fuel emissions within the wake of the landmark Paris Agreement on local weather change. The ultimate textual content of the Agreement, searching for to restrict international warming to a 1.5ºC rise, doesn’t explicitly point out transport, which critics have mentioned dangers the goal and calls into query who’s chargeable for reining in emissions from the sector. The backlash has sparked the International Maritime Organization, the U.N. company charged with regulating worldwide transport, to resume its dedication to scale back greenhouse fuel emissions from ships.